UDUS Open Educational Resources

A comparative rabies laboratory diagnosis: peculiar features. of samples from apparently healthy dogs in Nigeria

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Garba, A.
dc.contributor.author Oboegbulem, S.I
dc.contributor.author Elsa, A.T
dc.contributor.author Junaidu, A.U
dc.contributor.author Magaji, A.A
dc.contributor.author Umoh, J.U
dc.contributor.author Yahaya, K
dc.contributor.author Danbirni, S
dc.contributor.author Habu, A.K
dc.contributor.author Masdooq, A.A
dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-01T12:29:53Z
dc.date.available 2017-11-01T12:29:53Z
dc.date.issued 2008-05
dc.identifier.issn 1595 - 093X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/342
dc.description.abstract Many diagnostic methods have been used to detect rabies virus antigen. The preferred method for routine rabies diagnosis in fresh brain tissue is fluorescent antibody test (FAT). In this study, FAT was used to evaluate the presence of rabies virus antigen in the brain (hippocampus) of fifty apparently healthy dogs. Mouse inoculation test (MIT) and Microscopic examination for Negri bodies (MEN) were also employed to compare agreement, if any, between these employed methods. FAT detect ed 13 (26%), while MIT detected 10 (20%) samples positive for rabies virus antigen. Of the 10 samples positive by MIT only one sample was FAT negative all the remaining 9 samples were FAT positive. In all, 14 (28%) samples were positive by the two methods (FAT & MIT) combined. Out of these, 3 (21.4%) were positive by MEN and only those samples with the 3+ distribution of fluorescing viral antigen by FAT as well as positive by MIT showed Negri bodies. Despite the high sensitivity of FAT and the good agreemen t (Kappa = 0.72) between the two methods; there is need to employ MIT on samples from apparently healthy dogs that showed FAT negative. MEN is not a reliable test for samples from apparently healthy dogs; but it was suggested that any sample from apparentl y healthy dog that is positive by FAT with 3+ or more distribution of fluorescing viral antigen should be presumed MEN positive. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences en_US
dc.subject National Veterinary Research Institute en_US
dc.subject Faculty of Veterinary Medicine en_US
dc.title A comparative rabies laboratory diagnosis: peculiar features. of samples from apparently healthy dogs in Nigeria en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search UDUS-OER


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account